X Strengthens Control Over Twitter Trademark Amidst Legal Battle
Understanding the Trademark Dispute
The platform once known as Twitter, now operating under the name X following Elon Musk’s acquisition, has recently revised its Terms of Service to firmly assert ownership of the “Twitter” trademark. This move responds directly to a legal challenge from Operation Bluebird, a startup based in Virginia that has applied to register the “twitter” trademark for itself.
Operation Bluebird’s Legal Challenge adn Objectives
Operation Bluebird contends that by rebranding from “twitter” to “X,” Musk’s company effectively relinquished rights to the original brand name. Their request filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office references a July 23, 2023 statement by Elon Musk indicating an imminent farewell to the Twitter brand. Beyond seeking trademark registration,Operation Bluebird is actively recruiting users for a new social network via their website Twitter.new, signaling ambitions that extend beyond mere intellectual property claims.
Legal Minds Behind Operation Bluebird
The effort is led by two attorneys: Michael Peroff from Illinois and Stephen Coates, who formerly worked as a trademark attorney at Twitter itself. Their involvement raises questions about whether this initiative aims primarily at launching a competitive platform or leveraging valuable intellectual property for strategic advantage.
X’s Countermeasures and Revised Terms of Service
In response, X has initiated legal action asserting exclusive rights over both “Twitter” and “Tweet” trademarks along with related branding elements such as the iconic blue bird logo. To reinforce its position legally and publicly,X updated its Terms of Service effective January 15,2026. The revised terms explicitly state:
“Nothing in these terms grants you any right or license to use either ‘X’ or ‘Twitter’ names or trademarks-including logos, domain names, distinctive brand features-or any other proprietary rights without our explicit written permission.”
This update marks an important shift since previous versions only referenced X without mentioning Twitter at all.
Additional Policy Enhancements Reflecting Regulatory Trends
The latest terms also include minor adjustments addressing compliance with European Union regulations alongside provisions concerning AI-generated content moderation. Moreover, updates were made in X’s Privacy Policy introducing age verification technologies designed to improve user safety on the platform.
The Wider Impact on Social Media Brand Ownership
This ongoing dispute underscores how legacy brands retain notable value even after major rebranding efforts-especially when those brands have cultivated hundreds of millions of users globally over more than fifteen years. For instance, despite Facebook’s transformation into Meta Platforms Inc.,it continues vigorously protecting core trademarks like Instagram and WhatsApp due to their multibillion-dollar annual advertising revenue streams.
Similarly here,while X pursues innovation through new branding strategies-including plans for expanded financial services-maintaining control over “Twitter” safeguards against competitors exploiting residual goodwill tied up with one of social media’s most recognizable global names.




